The hopes of 1994 © Photo Shafiq Morton |
I HAVE covered every
single election since democracy, from the euphoric highs, the hope and the
bonhomie of 1994 to the disillusionment, the uncertainty and the simmering rage
of 2016.
Without doubt, in this month’s municipal elections
South African voters have shown their feelings, whether by engaging with the
ballot box, or choosing to stay away. Indeed, the public has indicated that the
honeymoon is over. No longer will it tolerate those who don’t deliver.
In the post-Mandela era, South Africans – who are
certainly not unmindful of historical imbalances – are becoming less and less
seduced by the sentimentality of struggle politics, and more and more concerned
about bread and butter issues.
Protest by ANC
members about candidate lists was the first sign that the 2016 local government
elections would be contested vigorously – even from within the ranks of the
governing party – where dissatisfaction with non-performing councillors had
come to a head.
Because of our constitutional framework, our
politics plays itself out in two spheres. The first is the outer, or multi-party
one, which exists at a municipal, provincial and national democratic stratum. It
is meant to be a level playing field, but it does have a systemic drawback. As
there is a proportional system, those voters outside any party have little say
in who will be their representatives.
Over 22 years it has created a distance from
power, and is an aspect of our system that might need review.
The second sphere of our politics is the inner one,
where one party currently overwhelms the political landscape, its inner workings
affecting the outside, greater population. The tri-partite alliance of the
SACP, COSATU and the ANC is the dominant space from within which power
emanates.
However, all of this
does not mean – as President Jacob Zuma once suggested in parliament – that because
one party has a large majority it has more rights than the minority. Zuma’s other sentiment –
that the ANC will rule until Jesus comes – could haunt him if ANC support dips
below 50% in the 2019, or 2025 national elections, as some commentators have predicted.
Coalition politics –
very much in the municipal frame right now – could well determine his
successor. It is largely hypothetical, but the EFF and DA could possibly be
wrangling with the ANC executive over who should be our next president.
The ANC was definitely hurt in this year’s local
government elections by national questions being conflated with municipal ones.
These questions reflected not only a growing unease over the ANC's executive
competency, but frustrations about economic growth, unemployment, corruption,
state capture and service delivery.
Then in KwaZulu Natal there were 14
politically-related killings, all believed to be within the ANC fold. In
the Western Cape there was much hurrah, but no leader. In Vuwani, Limpopo –
where a municipal demarcation dispute led to wide scale unrest and boycotts –
less than 4% of registered voters went to the polls.
It is obvious that the ANC has had to pay for Zuma
– from the Guptas and Nkandla to Nene-gate. It also has had to bear the criticism
of those elders still inside the ANC, but outside the Zuma circle. When party
heavyweights such as Kgalema Mothlante, Mavuso Msimang and Frank Chikane weigh
in about the ANC, then South Africans should listen.
It was Msimang who suggested in the Mail and
Guardian that the ANC was “broken”. It was Mothlante who said that when fear
reigns within you end up with a “dead organisation”. And Chikane, a
former Mbeki aide, wrote a letter to Luthuli House predicting dire consequences
if nothing was done about the malaise of the corruptibility of power within the
ANC, which he described as a “cancer”.
The ruling party
faces a Rubicon on this. Can the cancer be cured? Zuma cannot be blamed for
everything, but it is he who via Nkandla has dragged political debate to the
level of parliamentary hooliganism and who will be associated with the nepotism,
the parastatal looting and the self-enrichment that has so blighted Africa’s
oldest liberation movement.
A pertinent question
on every South African’s lips is the ANC’s persistence of cadre deployment at
all costs. Incompetent hacks get appointed to key positions, and the party not
only undermines itself, but the whole country. Patriarchal hierarchies only nurture
mediocrity; they undermine independent thought, innovation and excellence.
As I write this personal
review, it almost seems as if the ANC is so out of touch with the epoch that it
has become an anachronism, a political relic in its own time. One thing we observed
at this year’s elections was the absence of youth at the polls. Young South
Africans simply don’t relate to pot-bellied elders in green-and-yellow
tracksuits doing staged walkabouts on the SABC, which they don’t watch anyway.
In a cyber-age where
South Africans use 66 million cell phones (22 million being smartphones), where
15 million are on WhatsApp and over 1 billion SMSs are sent every month, the
ANC still gives the impression that knocking on people’s doors will win
elections.
Indeed, if the ANC
is to rescue itself from itself – and to uplift the country it currently rules –
some hard work lies ahead, as it is going to have to break new ground, create
new standards, banish old habits, become tech savvy and take serious note of the
youth bulge in our population.
Of course, this is a
challenge that all political parties will have to face. The nuts and bolts of constitutionalism,
the commitment of participatory democracy, and how our political system works –
right down to how to cast a vote – needs to be taught at our schools.
Undoubtedly, the
next few years are going to be challenging – and not only for the ANC. As
analyst Ebrahim Fakier has said, we are entering an era of uncertainty. As for the ruling party – to borrow from data
analyst Andile Ngcaba – chemotherapy will be the only way to solve the cancer
today, band aids will simply not be enough to save the ANC from disaster in
2019.
No comments:
Post a Comment